While I’m looking forward to getting my hands on 2.0 as much as anyone I must say making people pay for a beta version of software is just ... wrong. Who made such a decision and why? They need a good ol’ knock upside their noggin.
It’s obvious you don’t feel it’s ready for public consumption by renaming it from RC1 to PB, but you’re going to charge for it anyway? Maybe I need to tap your audience and try to sale the shed in my backyard that’s still only half built. 😉
Either postpone the launch or, if you must go live with what you have, offer a *serious* discount to those that buy your beta and help you work out the bugs. After all, they are doing work and/or taking a risk for you and that normally calls for compensation which could come in the form of a steep discount.