In this article CodeIgniter is mentioned twice under the name Code Ignitor, luckily they got the link right 😊
This is an archived forum and the content is probably no longer relevant, but is provided here for posterity.
The active forums are here.
September 09, 2008 8:29am
Subscribe [6]#1 / Sep 09, 2008 8:29am
In this article CodeIgniter is mentioned twice under the name Code Ignitor, luckily they got the link right 😊
#2 / Sep 09, 2008 8:50am
Should guide those people to http://ellislab.com/company/media/ 😊
#3 / Sep 09, 2008 8:54am
Codeignitor.com actually sends you to the proper place 😛 . Talk about a research fail though.
#4 / Sep 09, 2008 9:53am
I’ve typed in codeignition.com and codeingitor.com and a really small type codeingiter.com a few times and still do it even now a few days later. I guess it just one those words. 😊
#5 / Sep 09, 2008 11:50am
CodeIgnitor sounds so… I dunno n00bish. I like it much much more with the ‘e’. Good thing EllisLab is being clear though!
#6 / Sep 09, 2008 12:49pm
Trust me, a partner/client company that sometimes writes technical specs for us has this very annoying tendency to write: Codeignitor. Weve told them time and time again that it’s not correct 😊. And they are just: Well you know what we mean.
#7 / Sep 09, 2008 2:03pm
Haha, that’s funny Mark 😊
#8 / Sep 09, 2008 6:13pm
When spelling CodeIgniter I find it helpful to remember the ‘ignite’ portion of CodeIgniter. The word ‘ignito’ doesn’t sound right and therefore I always remember the right spelling.
I found this part of the article very interesting -
If you have to use a PHP framework, Rasmus likes Code Igniter the best, as it is “least like a framework”
Recommendation from the “Godfather” of php 😊