I guess we just differ in view there, Randy. :🤷: That’s a normal human reaction to me, and not an example of someone being overly sensitive. An expected outcome of criticism, good or bad, that would affect anyone associated with the thing being criticized, not just developers.
Derek, I used to participate quite a bit a few years ago in the Opera forums, right at the time they were getting rid of their (to some) patently offensive ad-supported version by making it all free.
You’re right, it’s perfectly acceptable for a programmer to have a “You don’t think I’m brilliant” response.
BUT, as a programmer, it should also be realized that customers will find odd, new, unexpected and sometimes useful ways of expressing a frustration that may be credible.
I don’t like to be criticized. Nobody does. Even off-handedly… 😊
Here’s the kicker, though: It doesn’t help to express that frustration to the customer. I had bad days where I was trying to wrap my head around someone’s problem and it just wasn’t working. I could get frustrated about my “help” not being effective, or I could be frustrated but look for the metadata, the kernel of the idea that the person was getting at. That’s growth.
Indiscriminate carping is a waste and we all hate fanboys (even fanboys hate fanboys, although I hear they love fangirls, although no one has spotted one in the wild).
Maybe PXlated has a point that your point may boomerang. And like you say, both valid responses.
But how to increase valuable communication? Parse the content, look for the fundamentals, recreate the issue with a new, open perspective, and find the root cause, which can then be precisely dealt with. In a lot of ways, I think EllisLabs does this extremely well.
So maybe it just seems odd to see you actually put that frustration in print, although perfectly understandable. Big deal.
Patience is a virtue. 😊