Thread

/* I am enjoying tinkering with this.  How do you integrate the rest of CI functionality into a controller?  I am trying to put in a profiler but can’t get it to work.  Is there a special syntax?

  $this->output->enable_profiler(TRUE); */

Never mind.  Got it working.

CE controllers are just CI controllers, so adding $this->output->enable_profiler(TRUE); at the end of your controllers works fine (I just tried it)

Hey, jTaby the new preview looks great!

The new layout (i have see the demo) is very beautiful and the new features are great! Thank you

thanks guys, glad you’re enjoying it.

Great advancements.  I see you have revised the dbdropdown plugin to include a ‘key’ param.  Very handy, but I don’t see that it has been released yet.  Is it possible to get this new release?  I realize it is still beta, but so is the app I’m tinkering with in Codex.

Hi jTaby

The <button> issue seems to remain for IE - do you have plans to resolve that?

Yes, It’ll be fixed by the time of the release.

I’m appreciative of your work.  Would you mind releasing your sandbox controller and view files?  You’re doing unusual things there that are different from your download release that I would like to get my head around.  Many thanks!

Hey guys, just wanted to let you know that I updated the live preview. On face-value, the only change is the FieldSet in ‘Example’. But I did work on the core libraries to add support for nested forms. The best way to show you what I mean is with an example:

Here’s the YAML that makes the FieldSet plugin work its magic:
general_information:<br />   class: FieldSet<br />   params:<br />       form:<br />         textbox_test:<br />           class: TextBox<br />         checkbox_test:<br />           class: CheckBox<br />           params:<br />               display_name: Hello there<br />         date_test:<br />           class: Date<br />         password_test:<br />           class: Password<br />         radiogroup_test:<br />           class: RadioGroup<br />           params:<br />               list:<br />                 1: One<br />                 2: Two<br />                 3: Three<br />         sessiondata_test:<br />           class: SessionData<br />           params:<br />               item: user_name<br />         textarea_test:<br />           class: TextArea<br />           attributes:<br />               rows:5<br />               cols:50<br />         time_test:<br />           class: Time<br />           params:<br />               -on_update

I will soon release the live preview as RC8…

p.s. my Parallels installation went bust, so if you guys could test it in IE for me, I’d be appreciative 😊

Can anyone give me some example to play around with User Levels? I have this problem. I want if some GOD User they can update other pasties members. But if the user only staff, they only edit they own post. So they can see other post by another post.

So, when user login in the same content, example post content staff user only able to edit and delete they own post. How to do that? and of course make the table view. Link to edit and delete for other staff post will be invincible/gone.

Please Help and thanks

One thing I’ve recently found is that when adding 2 fields that use the ManyToMany plugin, when displayed, each field that uses the ManyToMany plugin gets an extra “add new” link. I’ve only tested this with 1 and 2 ManyToMany fields on one page. It could be that with 3 or more an extra ‘add new’ gets added to every instance of the plugin on the page. If I find anything else out, I’ll post it here.

Another Problem in RC7, I try to add date form and my date picker doesn’t show up. can anybody tell me?

what are you calling your date field? could you show us some code?

@mahuti, i’ll have to look into that, thanks.

BTW, this works great with new records, but does not allow me to edit records that already exist in the system. Looking at the user registration system it appears that you’re tracking all of the records editable by users. Is there a configuration option I missed that would override this feature?