It needs a new owner before it gets released without doubt.
Why is that?
This is an archived forum and the content is probably no longer relevant, but is provided here for posterity.
The active forums are here.
September 11, 2012 5:13am
Subscribe [12]#16 / Aug 09, 2013 8:49pm
It needs a new owner before it gets released without doubt.
Why is that?
#17 / Aug 10, 2013 1:34am
I disagree CI 3.0 to become CI 2.2. The major version should be incremented, because there is a new, strong “ucfirst” naming convention. There is also a new API-convention “Return NULL, (not FALSE anymore) if you have nothing to return”. There are some new features within the database query builder (thank you, narfbg). There is an “official” native PHP-session driver.
There is no difference if its 3.0 or 2.2, but for Major version there should be Major changes..
And such Major changes can be for example using Namespaces, rebuilding Core, rewriting the how system or somehting as that..
#18 / Aug 10, 2013 3:53am
@sv3tli0
Sorry, I have to disagree again. I mentioned Major changes, some of them break backward compatibility. Also, I have to stress again, we know the current development version as CI 3.0 for a long time. Many thing are written, referring to version 3. See the title of this discussion.
CI 3.0 is a major version by initial intention, it was developed as such with decision-making appropriate for a major version. Your suggestion is wrong, sorry, it would create a lot of confusion.
#19 / Aug 10, 2013 5:43am
It’s might be a problem to install CI3 on PHP 5.4 or 5.5 ?
I have CI2 on PHP 5.3.27 server and it’s running well…
#20 / Aug 11, 2013 7:19am
Feedback on 3? Just want to know, bugs and anything…
Thanks!
Julia
Choofie –Owner
http://www.choofie.com.au/
#21 / Aug 12, 2013 11:30am
CodeIgniter is dead for ever…
#22 / Aug 12, 2013 11:42am
CodeIgniter is dead for ever…
I hope not…
#23 / Aug 12, 2013 1:59pm
CodeIgniter is dead for ever…
CI isn’t dead until people stop developing with it, and I don’t see that happening for a few years to come. CI3 has more changes then any other version to date, so if that’s what you call dead…
#24 / Aug 12, 2013 2:14pm
CodeIgniter is dead for ever…
CI isn’t dead until people stop developing with it, and I don’t see that happening for a few years to come. CI3 has more changes then any other version to date, so if that’s what you call dead…
I’m desperate to CI3…
it’s late to release…
#25 / Aug 14, 2013 6:41am
#26 / Oct 07, 2013 2:54am
Hi
Where is the guide to update CI 2 to 3 ? I think that I saw it on Github but I can’t found it…Thanks.
You can see it here: https://www.chuongduong.net/ci3/installation/upgrading.html
I just build it from Github source and will continue to update weekly or monthly.
I disagree CI 3.0 to become CI 2.2. The major version should be incremented, because there is a new, strong “ucfirst” naming convention. There is also a new API-convention “Return NULL, (not FALSE anymore) if you have nothing to return”. There are some new features within the database query builder (thank you, narfbg). There is an “official” native PHP-session driver.
There is no difference if its 3.0 or 2.2, but for Major version there should be Major changes..
And such Major changes can be for example using Namespaces, rebuilding Core, rewriting the how system or somehting as that..
I also disagree with Ci 3.0 to become CI 2.2. All CI 2.X should compatible with each other but the CI 3.0 is too different. All source code you wrote with CI 2.0 will cannot run with CI 3.0. You have to change a lot of thing and many deprecated function still able to use in CI 2.0 will not exists in CI 3.0.
All of my project since begin of 2012 are using CI and didn’t meet any problem yet. CI 3 still has some bugs but I think it is can acceptable for me 😊