Re: http://ee-podcast.com/episodes/ellislab-qa-with-james-mathias
About halfway through, James shares some interesting comments on EL’s position regarding Pixel & Tonic’s Assets as “competition” for the internal work being undertaken with the native EE File Manager.
I’m curious about the community’s thoughts on this…
Now that the new(-ish) File Manager has been released, I have to ask, is this really the best continuing use of resources?
My initial reaction is that there is a heck of lot of work to be done, especially within the CP… I’m concerned that so many resources are apparently still being tied up on the File Manager, when Assets—for better or worse—makes a point of doing what the File Manager currently doesn’t (hello subfolders). Why take the position of seeing Assets as “competition” to be “beat”?
The statement that EL needs to “compete” with third-party add-ons is troubling in general… Why? EL’s already secured their revenue from the core license, so how is a third-party add-on “competition”? Moreover, if the add-on does it better, why reinvent the wheel, instead of just facilitating add-ons from doing their part even more? The reality is, EL has limited resources—resources that are clearly strapped as it is right now—and Pixel & Tonic (or any other add-on dev) are essentially extending the dev team working on making EE better for everyone. In this case, despite the criticism James levies at Assets, from what I have seen, most EE devs agree that it has File Manager beat.
How long is EL going to focus on “improving” the native File Manager, which has basically now been made redundant by Assets?
At this point, there is a heck of a lot of other core functionality that is dated (at best), or broken (at worst). As the feedback shows, there are dozens of CP UX issues or feature requests to address, the Forum module badly needs an update to get out of 2004… member management needs multiple member group support & non-speciality member profile templates… the Wiki module seems to be abandoned entirely… and the Comments module has been already acknowledged by EL to desperately need an update (http://ellislab.com/blog/entry/lets_discuss_disqus), but for now has been passed over even by EL themselves in favour of Disqus… These are all points raised in the podcast as questions, but with no concrete indication from James that any of these are on tap (with the exception of a bit of a call-out for improved Member Group support). These lagging components are largely what is keeping EE stuck five years ago.
I don’t find much solace in James’ “infinite timeline” statement—I mean, I’m glad to hear he’s in it for the long haul, but I don’t think such commitment lessens the need to address these long-standing issues ASAP.
Does it really have to take 3 months to remove some accordions from the CP?
Really looking forward to seeing the roadmap for what’s on tap… It’s hard to enthusiastic when it seems the focus on the File Manager seems to be more about saving face than committing to putting the focus on improvement where it is most needed.
Thoughts?