@grrramps see my post immediately before yours. Wordpress, Django, Symphony, etc. all have superior UI.
Thjs is where we disagree. WP is nice, yes, but superior? In what ways? WP does not do half of what’s in EE. It’s attractive but simplistic at best. Drupal is a mess. Newer version of Joomla is an improvement, but very limited in scope. Django and Symphony suffer from simplicity (not near the options of EE).
Personally I would have created an extremely plain, simple UI that can then be easily customized to some degree for basic use - similar functionality to Basecamp (not to say that I think the Basecamp UI is that nice, but the flexibility is nice and would suit most peoples’ needs).
It’s just so easy to say, “I don’t like that” but without providing qualifying guidance as to what’s wrong, why it’s wrong, and, importantly, how it could or should be made better (and with a definition of what better is).
Add the same kind of EE complexity to other CMS CPs and you’ll see the problem. There’s just an awful lot going on in EE’s CP. That said, we could do without some of the Javascript eye candy. It’s more annoying than efficient or effective (not to mention the performance hits on some servers).