is that awful layout what the site is suppose to look like?
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder, I suppose. The site appears to be of a rather standard layout for a business/product site. Certainly not overly confusing.
i looked at the source and it’s referencing files that aren’t there (i think, didn’t spend a lot of time).
That’s rather common on larger sites. I suppose their developers have similar probems—keeping track of where everything goes. Or went.
I did a quick check of Apple, Mozilla, and W3C sites. Apple’s is prettiest by far, but doesn’t validate. Mozilla is attractive and straightforward, somewhat similar to OpenX, but with a few warnings here and there. W3C won’t win any design awards, but validates. Go figure.
Thanks for the link! when I tried to download it i was directed to an XML page that wasn’t able to render.
Seems to be working now.
OpenX is loaded with features and scales very well (dependent upon hardware configuration, of course). Installation is similar to EE, as is maintenance, though it’s more complex to update/upgrade. With few exceptions, I’ve found it to be commercially stable. The OpenX Hosting option is attractive (if you can get accepted). They recently upgraded servers and problems persisted for a few weeks, but are gone now.
What I like about Google AdManager is that you can set it and forget it. OpenX requires typical MySQL DB maintenance, care, feeding, and watching. However, OpenX can be set up and running in minutes. Google AdManager still requires the Google AdManager for Dummies book (it’s a geeky, non-intuitive mess, but once it’s up, it tends to stay up). It’s difficult to beat the price of either product.