ExpressionEngine CMS
Open, Free, Amazing

Thread

This is an archived forum and the content is probably no longer relevant, but is provided here for posterity.

The active forums are here.

activerecord vs orm

October 02, 2007 2:34pm

Subscribe [1]
  • #1 / Oct 02, 2007 2:34pm

    m9dfukc

    11 posts

    hmm,

    i don’t get it - can anybody explain me whats the difference between active record and orm/differnce between those booth libraries - ci active record class - ci orm class.

    thanks for your help
    andreas

  • #2 / Oct 02, 2007 2:37pm

    Michael Wales

    2070 posts

    ActiveRecord has been updated since June (when ORM was last updated).

    I think it really comes down to personal preference though - they are both great Object Relational Mapping solutions. I think the ActiveRecord library has a bit more of the Ruby on Rails feel to it than ORM does. Whereas ORM feels like a more solid solution that was designed with PHP in mind (rather than stuffing RoR into PHP’s constraints).

  • #3 / Oct 02, 2007 5:39pm

    m9dfukc

    11 posts

    much thanks for the info 😊

    i will test the active record class it seems there will be no further development for the orm class.

  • #4 / Oct 02, 2007 5:53pm

    m9dfukc

    11 posts

    are the performance comparison between these booth implementations? did you test them booth - which is your favorite class?

  • #5 / Oct 02, 2007 7:15pm

    Michael Wales

    2070 posts

    I’ve never performed a benchmark across the two - but the results would be interesting, nonetheless.

.(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)

ExpressionEngine News!

#eecms, #events, #releases