Hmmm, I am looking at my source code and don’t find the double “..” that you mention, and have looked carefully at the general configuration entries, they all look OK. I wonder if you can tell me exactly where you caught that at?
Its in the rendered source code for http://www.gruenesheet.com/, not in the template code.
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd">
<html >
<head>
<title>Ballet San Antonio</title>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
<link rel='stylesheet' type='text/css' media='all' href='http://www.gruenesheet..com/index.php?css=BalletSanAntonio/site_css.v.1271191695' />
<style type='text/css' media='screen'>@import "http://www.gruenesheet..com/index.php?css=BalletSanAntonio/site_css.v.1271191695";</style>
</head>
<body>
Also if you view the source of your site and then go to the direct URL minus the extra ‘.’ you will see the background image url issues as well. Here are some cuts from your stylesheet.
.bar-homepage {
background: url("http://www.gruenesheet..com/images/page-toppers/homepage.jpg") top left no-repeat;
height: 284px;
margin: 0 0 15px 0;
padding: 0;
}
.bar-about {
background: url("http://www.gruenesheet..com/images/page-toppers/mission3.jpg") top left no-repeat;
height: 284px;
margin: 0 0 15px 0;
padding: 0;
}
As far as linking directly to css file vs using EE it’s personal pref. I haven’t found speed benefits to direct linking and like as many of my items to be in one place as possible. However, direct linking may help get your stylesheet to load but I think you will still have some issues with the double period when using path or other tags.
Later,
Bryan