hmm,
i don’t get it - can anybody explain me whats the difference between active record and orm/differnce between those booth libraries - ci active record class - ci orm class.
thanks for your help
andreas
This is an archived forum and the content is probably no longer relevant, but is provided here for posterity.
The active forums are here.
October 02, 2007 2:34pm
Subscribe [1]#1 / Oct 02, 2007 2:34pm
hmm,
i don’t get it - can anybody explain me whats the difference between active record and orm/differnce between those booth libraries - ci active record class - ci orm class.
thanks for your help
andreas
#2 / Oct 02, 2007 2:37pm
ActiveRecord has been updated since June (when ORM was last updated).
I think it really comes down to personal preference though - they are both great Object Relational Mapping solutions. I think the ActiveRecord library has a bit more of the Ruby on Rails feel to it than ORM does. Whereas ORM feels like a more solid solution that was designed with PHP in mind (rather than stuffing RoR into PHP’s constraints).
#3 / Oct 02, 2007 5:39pm
much thanks for the info 😊
i will test the active record class it seems there will be no further development for the orm class.
#4 / Oct 02, 2007 5:53pm
are the performance comparison between these booth implementations? did you test them booth - which is your favorite class?
#5 / Oct 02, 2007 7:15pm
I’ve never performed a benchmark across the two - but the results would be interesting, nonetheless.