This wikipedia article has CodeIgniter in the top list, but not in the bottom list.
Anyone interested to build out the specs table so CI is properly represented?
This is an archived forum and the content is probably no longer relevant, but is provided here for posterity.
The active forums are here.
September 10, 2007 12:02pm
Subscribe [1]#1 / Sep 10, 2007 12:02pm
This wikipedia article has CodeIgniter in the top list, but not in the bottom list.
Anyone interested to build out the specs table so CI is properly represented?
#2 / Sep 10, 2007 12:24pm
#3 / Sep 10, 2007 1:38pm
I don’t know… CI’s “active record” isn’t really a true implementation of the active record pattern. Also, since when does CI have ORM?
#4 / Sep 10, 2007 2:31pm
Woops - a copy/paste error on the ORM.
I’ll re-word the Active Record statement to identify it is a modified version.
#5 / Sep 10, 2007 2:57pm
I did a complete rewrite on the CodeIgniter Wikipedia entry modelling it off of CakePHP’s entry.
Let me know what you think, feel free to work on it as well.