ExpressionEngine CMS
Open, Free, Amazing

Thread

This is an archived forum and the content is probably no longer relevant, but is provided here for posterity.

The active forums are here.

Which WYSIWYG editor is the best choice for EE?

April 16, 2008 2:36am

Subscribe [10]
  • #16 / May 21, 2008 8:18pm

    JT Thompson

    745 posts

    Yeah that’s it. Thanks! I took a screenshot so you could see how it integrats, and put some sample text in to show formatting. I put a green box with a red outline and an arrow, so you can see the button I added to the MCE panel. clicking that brings up the window you see.

    I’ve got this configured to produce valid XHTML 1.0 Strict code, including the photos. I put this stuff together because my contributers don’t know html, and since I did this I’ve had zero complaints.

    Here’s the TinyMCE page
    http://tinymce.moxiecode.com/

    And here’s the iBrowser page:
    http://j-cons.com/downloads/

    here’s the screenshot:
    http://www.e-referrer.com/stuff/mce.jpg

  • #17 / May 21, 2008 9:18pm

    lebisol

    2234 posts

    Ibrowser was definetly nice looking but I had issues with its speed…so I stuck with TinyMCE intergrated and got help setting it up in this thread.
    Loading text first then requesting images (image preview) is way faster.
    My 2 cents….
    All the best!

  • #18 / May 21, 2008 9:53pm

    JT Thompson

    745 posts

    Not sure what you mean about loading text first?

    I’ve not noticed any speed issues. It would be client side problems since it’s all javascript.

    EDIT: by the way, I didn’t mean that in a negative light. Was just mentioning I dind’t experience any slowness. If any of my contributors (there’s only 4) did they haven’t mentioned it.

  • #19 / May 22, 2008 1:58am

    Ingmar

    29245 posts

    That jQuery markitup is nice, but it’s not a WYSIWYG by any means.

    One of its most compelling features, in my book.

  • #20 / May 22, 2008 2:06am

    lebisol

    2234 posts

    None taken, always looking for a better editor solution.
    Ibrowser took about 1 min to load (IE 7, FF2..14) folder with 40 or so images (800KB) and upon closing of the window it would reload into the same process for next insert. Quite annoying.
    Text loading…with the link and technique above it uses image list loaded into forms drop-down and requests are made 1 image per selection (see img.). This, for some reason, works in a matter of a seconds. It could be my settings of Ibrowser plugin but it never really got faster…could be just me 😊.
    Thanks!

  • #21 / May 22, 2008 6:35am

    JT Thompson

    745 posts

    That jQuery markitup is nice, but it’s not a WYSIWYG by any means.

    One of its most compelling features, in my book.

    errr, this is a thread requesting a WYSIWYG editor.

    None taken, always looking for a better editor solution.
    Ibrowser took about 1 min to load (IE 7, FF2..14) folder with 40 or so images (800KB) and upon closing of the window it would reload into the same process for next insert. Quite annoying.
    Text loading…with the link and technique above it uses image list loaded into forms drop-down and requests are made 1 image per selection (see img.). This, for some reason, works in a matter of a seconds. It could be my settings of Ibrowser plugin but it never really got faster…could be just me 😊.
    Thanks!

    That’s interesting. I’d like to know if my users are seeing those load times.

    I just checked, the images directory I’m using has 180 images in it and it took about 15 seconds to load them all. Personally I don’t use the browse feature much, I use it to upload. But you raise some good points.

  • #22 / May 22, 2008 7:27am

    Ingmar

    29245 posts

    That jQuery markitup is nice, but it’s not a WYSIWYG by any means.

    One of its most compelling features, in my book.

    errr, this is a thread requesting a WYSIWYG editor.

    Well, I mean it’s close enough for my users, really. You don’t have to remember the codes to use, because the editor inserts them for you, but the resulting code remains clean and usable. I for one like it.

  • #23 / May 22, 2008 11:19am

    Ryan M.

    1511 posts

    For the record, Markitup does have a little “preview” button, which is sort of a live preview that opens up directly below the field you’re editing.

    Also, I’m pretty close to having a Markitup custom field extension made, with per-field settings. You can see screenshots starting at this post of this thread.

  • #24 / May 22, 2008 12:09pm

    Todd D.

    460 posts

    I disagree with classifying markitup as a wysiwyg editor.  In fact, it is nothing of the sort. It just provides a more intuitive means for styling text content and perhaps easier image manipulation. That being said… this is a far cry from a Front Page or a Dreamweaver design view.

  • #25 / May 22, 2008 12:14pm

    Ryan M.

    1511 posts

    I disagree with classifying markitup as a wysiwyg editor.

    Well, YEAH. Read the front page of markitup’s site:

    markItUp! is not meant to be a “Full-Features-Out-of-the-Box”-editor. Instead it is a very lightweight, customizable and flexible engine made to meet the developer’s needs in their CMSes, blogs, forums or websites. markItUp! is not a WYSIWYG editor, and it never will be.

    I was just pointing out that it at least has a preview. I’ll exit this thread now - good luck with your WYSIWYG’s, folks.

  • #26 / May 22, 2008 2:50pm

    Todd D.

    460 posts

    Sorry if I ruffled any feathers. That was not my intention. I, too, do not want to see any bloated wysiwyg editor included standard with EE.  Maybe a very light one as a plugin.

  • #27 / May 22, 2008 3:44pm

    lebisol

    2234 posts

    @JT Thompson
    Yeah mee too, I am quite impressed with Ibrowser look & feel but performance was discouraging and if anyone else wants to share please post.

    @mdesign
    Keep up the work, it looks like a nice aid and why not offer an alternative tool.

    All the best!

  • #28 / Jun 17, 2008 7:44pm

    lebisol

    2234 posts

    Small update…I suppose mainly for JT and Ibrowser plugin.
    Here is what my host came back with:

    Your account has spawned 40 processes and thus the system has been rejecting further requests, hence the ISE error.

    The script which generated most of the processes is:

    /public_html/tinymce/jscripts/tiny_mce/plugins/ibrowser/scripts/phpThumb/phpThumb.php

    You may need to contact an expert local web developer to review this script and to optimize it for you. Once the script is patched according the above limit the issue should be resolved. Note that we have set the above limit in order to provide equal resources for each account on the server….

    <insert their push for dedicated server here>

    I suppose the “optimizing” part is subjective but there is something that plugin making it crawl & hog…for what is worth…
    All the best!

  • #29 / Sep 17, 2008 12:37am

    Alex Frol

    1 posts

    today I find very helpful articles about WYSIWYG in EE - “file and image management plugins for tinymce” and I think its can be interesting no only for me.

  • #30 / Sep 17, 2008 2:18am

    gridonic

    231 posts

    I think the best editor for inexperienced users, including a file and image management is the combination of TinyMCE and their Image + FileManager.

.(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)

ExpressionEngine News!

#eecms, #events, #releases