The only way of putting repetative numerical values into templates is either by hard-coding them in or by enabling and using php to do it. I always try to avoid enabling php in templates for security purposes, and hard-coding in for example a drop-down select box with 100 values is never fun.

So i have developed a loop plugin that solves the problem by allowing you to perform loops in your templates. Its a free download here:

http://www.putyourlightson.net/projects/loop

Interesting, but shouldn’t that go in the Plugins forum?

Hi Ben,

Great Add-On!

A few notes:
1) when using the plugin inside a weblog tag (or query tag), the {count} variable will show the weblog’s {count} variable, you could change yours to something like {loop_count} or {counter}.
2) you might also want to start prefixing your EE Add-Ons

Now let’s see if we can use this plugin to easily create multiple columns of weblog entries

Cheers!

thanks for the suggestions.  i’ve changed the file name to pi.for_loop.php and the variable to {loop_count}.

please feel free to post any cool uses of the plugin, i expect there might be a few!!

Hi ben,

From the Developer Guidelines: (although I don’t think it is a requirement)

“Choose a prefix that is unique to your identity as a developer or company”

...so why not pi.bc_loop.php or pi.pylo_loop.php?

I just tested the plugin with some rating value (0 to 5), pretty cool.

Hi Ben,

Looks set to be a really great little add-on! Well done.

One little thing though and this is me just nitpicking but on your page it says “repetative numerical” instead of “repetitive numerical”

Great plugin though and definitely one I will use so thanks for that.

Best wishes,

Mark

...so why not pi.bc_loop.php or pi.pylo_loop.php?

i think the file name and the exp tag should be intuitive so that it is easier to understand when seen in a template.  for_loop actually describes it pretty well since three values (initial, limit, increment) have to be set, and i assume most people have heard of a for loop, but maybe not…?

@mark: that really is nitpicking but i’ll change it just for you!!

ben c - 27 March 2008 05:48 AM

@mark: that really is nitpicking but i’ll change it just for you!!

So shoot me

Actually just kidding, don’t shoot me please!! I have just always been one to notice spelling mistakes and sometimes I really should just keep my g*b shut. Working in radio advertising it has become a staple part of everyday life for me unfortunately!

I’ll bet I’ve probably made some mistakes in this post anyway so will cower off into the corner now!!

Again, great plugin (shouldn’t this word really be plug-in?) though so thanks for that!

Best wishes,

Mark

Ben,

The name being so intuitive is exactly why you should prefix it

Again from the Guidlines:

When your class or filename is a common word, or might quite likely be identically named in another PHP script, provide a unique prefix to help prevent collision. Always realize that your end users may be running other add-ons or third party PHP scripts.

I’m not trying to annoy you, just hoping that all EE devs start prefix their add-ons with a personal prefix like the Guidelines propose.
Most EE devs are already doing this…

*ducks and starts updating his own add-ons

haha, ok i’ll consider it, thanks cocoa

cheers mark!

ben c - 27 March 2008 06:02 AM

cheers mark!

I’m sure you don’t really mean that!
I can hear you scraping away at my Avatar on screen trying to gouge out my eyes!!

Best wishes,

Mark

Moved to the Plugins forum.  Ben, after you’ve assembled the feedback and are happy with your plugin, don’t forget to submit it to the Add-On Library!