6 of 6
6
ExpressionEngine 2.0: fully CodeIgnited!
Posted: 11 August 2008 03:15 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 91 ]  
Lab Assistant
Avatar
RankRank
Total Posts:  127
Joined  11-16-2007

I’m curious why the lack of transparency about where ee2 is in the development stages. Seems like an easy decision to be transparent about and will quell a lot of the concerns about when it’s coming and what’s going to break/change.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 11 August 2008 04:37 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 92 ]  
Research Assistant
Avatar
RankRankRank
Total Posts:  486
Joined  02-09-2004
Dave Rau - 11 August 2008 03:15 PM

I’m curious why the lack of transparency about where ee2 is in the development stages.

This question has been asked and addressed a lot.

Comes down to they don’t want to promise what they can’t deliver and they’ve had bad experiences telling people things in advance.

This said, I heard it was going to be able to make julienned fries, and if it doesn’t I’m going to tell everyone how bad it sucks!

I consider it amazing they gave a projected release date.

And honestly, at this point, what would the point of transparency be? Then the 3 weeks of summer they have left would be spent answering comments/complaints/criticism/compliments and not actually developing.

 Signature 

http://www.jackassletters.com
http://www.puppypotpie.com
http://christopher.jorgensen.name

Profile
 
 
Posted: 12 August 2008 08:47 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 93 ]  
Research Assistant
Avatar
RankRankRank
Total Posts:  921
Joined  07-18-2006

I’m a bit surprised about the lack of news myself. With only 3 weeks of summer left it would be pretty surprising to see a general public release IMHO within that stated timeframe. But then again if it was going to be delayed it would probably be pretty obvious by now and I would think they would announce that ASAP so as to minimize the wailing and gnashing of teeth.

I’m just pulling this out of my arse, but it seems like the dev preview should be out at least a few weeks before the general release? So…. like last week?

Profile
 
 
Posted: 12 August 2008 08:50 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 94 ]  
Research Assistant
Avatar
RankRankRank
Total Posts:  918
Joined  02-05-2002

only 3 weeks? is it September already? wink

 Signature 

Member of the EE Pro Network

Profile
 
 
Posted: 12 August 2008 09:04 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 95 ]  
Research Assistant
Avatar
RankRankRank
Total Posts:  486
Joined  02-09-2004

I guess it depends on how one looks at these things.

To me, summer starts when it gets really hot, and ends when stuff starts to die. So yeah, I guess we have until sometime in September. Wikipedia says so as well.

But one could also look at it in other ways. Students are back to school after the summer break, it’s getting darker earlier and staying that way longer, there’s Halloween candy in the grocery stores, and swim suits are getting harder to find. Summer may still be here, but it’s in the rearview mirror.

Since there is no release date other than “summer,” we only get speculation. Which, as stated in my above post is fine with me. Just at some point, you will be past the spirit of things, and into the letter or things. And if EE 2.0 comes out on the last actual day of Summer, I think you’re going to have a few irritated people. Me not being one of them. I have no plans for an immediate switch over (I’ll let people that know more than me be the test subjects).

Oh, and I just pulled 3 weeks out of the air, as it kind of felt like how much Summer there was left. I wasn’t trying to impose a deadline on anyone.

 Signature 

http://www.jackassletters.com
http://www.puppypotpie.com
http://christopher.jorgensen.name

Profile
 
 
Posted: 12 August 2008 09:22 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 96 ]  
Research Assistant
Avatar
RankRankRank
Total Posts:  921
Joined  07-18-2006

I think they’re using the Apple method of deadlines: summer means the last minute of the last day of summer.  Here in VT the end of summer is when the leaves start turning.  I’ve got a couple trees dying on my property, so for them 2.0 is already late wink Guess I should have looked at a calendar rather than take that 3 weeks as ‘official’ end of summer.  With the temps being in the 70s for the past few weeks it sure seems like summer is almost over.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 12 August 2008 11:37 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 97 ]  
Administrator
Avatar
RankRankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  40207
Joined  05-14-2004

The temperatures here are going up, up, up again.  Never mind EE 2.0, but c’mon Autumn.  I want to see some color changes, darn it.

 Signature 
Profile
MSG
 
 
Posted: 14 August 2008 08:34 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 98 ]  
Summer Student
Avatar
Total Posts:  10
Joined  04-15-2008

Does anyone know about the price for EE2.0? If I buy 1.6 today, will the upgrade to 2.0 cost me another $249.95?

 Signature 

/MikeeJay

Profile
 
 
Posted: 14 August 2008 08:38 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 99 ]  
Lab Technician
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  1008
Joined  02-28-2006

It was stated earlier that it would not cost more to upgrade than to buy v.2 outright. It may cost more and everybody would have to pay the upgrade cost to have access to V.2. No official word on what the pricing will be, but you wouldn’t be penalized and wind up paying more, if you buy a 1.6 branch license.
FYI from the forums earlier.

 Signature 

Beta, beta “Baked Potato-ee”  >:)~

Profile
 
 
Posted: 14 August 2008 09:14 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 100 ]  
Research Assistant
Avatar
RankRankRank
Total Posts:  486
Joined  02-09-2004

EllisLab has said the price will be “fair,” and that people won’t be hurt by buying now. I’d even expect a bit of a break for existing customers, but I don’t speak for EE.

I’ve decided what I am really waiting for is 1.6.5! Enough of this 2.0 anticipation, when’s 1.6.5 coming out!

 Signature 

http://www.jackassletters.com
http://www.puppypotpie.com
http://christopher.jorgensen.name

Profile
 
 
Posted: 14 August 2008 10:01 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 101 ]  
Lab Assistant
Avatar
RankRank
Total Posts:  132
Joined  02-04-2006

Maybe EE team was reffering to the Mars Summer wink

Profile
 
 
Posted: 15 August 2008 01:27 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 102 ]  
Professor
Avatar
RankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  10835
Joined  04-15-2006
Bharrabhaz - 14 August 2008 10:01 PM

Maybe EE team was reffering to the Mars Summer wink

Been there, done that already!! wink grin wink

Best wishes,

Mark

 Signature 

Shopping Cart Plugin
Full list of add-ons
———————————————————-
Buy me a drink, or two if you like!!

Profile
 
 
Posted: 01 September 2008 05:28 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 103 ]  
Summer Student
Total Posts:  1
Joined  09-01-2008

I was very excited to stumble upon this post and hear about the implementation of jQuery to CodeIgniter. In a sort of journey of self-discovery I’ve recently abandoned re-inventing any more wheels and decided last year not to engage in any more custom code.

I “wasted” nearly a year toying with Ruby on Rails before I sort of woke up and managed to free myself from the cult compound and came back to PHP.

So, I’ve been learning jQuery lately (again refusing to write any more custom javascript) and trying to integrate it with CodeIgniter gracefully. Which has been challenging. Here’s why:

I’m a bit of standards-geek: XTHML 1.0 Strict and CSS-positioning for everything. And yes, it better validate or I have to go to confession every week that the site stays up. Okay, maybe that’s the OCD and ADHD talking there, but you get the point.

What *kills* me is those who implement external scripts (and sometimes CSS stylesheets) on every page of a website… adding unknown kilobytes to pages where they are fully unnecessary.

So, I hope when CI makes the leap to integrate jQuery (oh, boy… I can’t wait for $this-javascript->do_magic), that they will somehow take that into account.

Here’s what I’m doing on a current project and I’m certainly not clear if this is the best way, but it’s what I thought of.

In CI, I have a header_view (as we all do, right?), but it quite ungraciously ends at some 20 lines past my opening body tag. In the old days, I’d end it one line before my closing </head> tag and then try to slap extra includes for certain pages (that would contain page specific javascript, etc) at the top of my “page” (or “section” for you T/P fans out there) before my closing </head>.

But yeah, that’s a lot of duplicate code in various sections/pages, particularly if you also want to include your template header in your header_view (your masthead, etc). You know, if you’re into that “code in one place and one place only” thing.

In T/P you could use conditional tags and just include certain “forms” (snippets), but that adds extra dB calls, wear and tear on the little PHP guy in the computer, and so forth. But that’s how I did it - so shoot me.

But in CI, here’s what I’ve been trying:

In my controller, I include two array variables: $scripts[] and $jquery_scripts[]. The $scripts[] contain the actual js filenames that I want referenced in the head for my external script loads.

The $jquery_scripts[] are the line by line calls to jquery in my body onload stuff (or $(function)... whatever).

Then in my header_view.php, I basically do an isset for $scripts and run them through a foreach loop in my load script tags… something like {base_url}/static/js/{insert $script here}.js

Then I do the same thing for the jquery_scripts array except after my $(function) call.

Thus, each page only loads the external script it needs and doesn’t waste time doing jQuery calls on elements that wouldn’t exist anyway. I’ve seen sites implement table-striping (zebra striping… whatever you wanna call it) that run that call on every page, even though there are only 2 tables on the whole site.

It could probably be even better, though. The jquery_scripts are really nothing more than lines of code (which I have to repeat on certain pages) so I really need to get those saved in some globalish variable that I can access from all controllers.

For instance, there’s no sense in loading the form handling features of some ui.jquery thing on the home page, the about page, etc… (uh, unless there is a form there of course). So, since I/we use a bunch of them thar jquery goodness for forms, why not just save the whole form calls as an array and just pass them just on controllers that deal with forms? Well, because a) I’m still somewhat lazy (come on!) and b) you have to start making allowances for different ids and classes on some forms that might not be on others (particularly true when developing a web app over a web “site”). But, it probably could be done.

Anyway, I pass that on as my official “two cents worth” and am hoping that when/if CI integrates jquery so gracefully as they seem to be promising, that this is thought of. But even if not, it will make it easier for us. Thanks so much for choosing jQuery as your first library for this.

 Signature 

Edison Web Services

Profile
 
 
Posted: 01 September 2008 08:01 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 104 ]  
Lab Technician
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  1008
Joined  02-28-2006

Nice first post Lawrence, welcome aboard the EE forums.
Thanks for reviving the thread, I expected to see pleading/begging for the new version, due out this hurricane season.
Best wishes to anyone weathering out the storms down south as well.

 Signature 

Beta, beta “Baked Potato-ee”  >:)~

Profile
 
 
   
6 of 6
6
 
Post Marker Legend
New Topic New posts Hot Topic Hot Topic with new posts New Poll New Poll Moved Topic Moved Topic Sticky Topic Sticky topic
Old Topic No new posts Hot Old Topic Hot Topic with no new posts Old Poll Old Poll Closed Topic Closed Topic Announcement Announcements
Theme
Change Theme
Visitor Statistics
The most visitors ever was 1743, on December 02, 2009 03:47 PM
Total Registered Members: 120561 Total Logged-in Users: 64
Total Topics: 126605 Total Anonymous Users: 30
Total Replies: 665583 Total Guests: 325
Total Posts: 792188    
Members ( View Memberlist )