First off, I didn’t read all the replies here so this post may be completely moot. if so I’m sorry.
This is one of the misconceptions that creates a problem.
those saying “how much work do they do in an hour for that price” need to understand, you are not paying for the work, you’re paying for the knowledge and experience the developer has. How much work is a doctor doing in an hour for his $900? you’re paying for his vast knowledge and ability.
There are thousands of ways to accomplish things in a development environment. Doing it correctly, efficiently and cleanly is not cheap. just because something gets accomplished doesn’t mean it’s done right. it could tax the server load, create problems down the road, not be expandable etc.
I don’t think $100 is out of line at all for a professional, good developer.
I am glad somebody mentioned this. It’s not just the amount of work per hour, but rather the experience, maybe also customer support. How fast does the developer respond, does he respond at all, how is communication etc.. If you think about an easy development project like html and css coding, I am not sure that the $150/hour dev can be three times as fast as the $50 dev for same quality work.
