I must say that I don’t understand why the membership templates are treated so much differently than other templates.
yes, there might be security issues and there are a lot of them, but there is no reason why there couldnt be the option of a master template, since all the templates end up having a header, footer, a message area, a menu area and a content area.
Allowing people to change a master template to reskin around these areas, without having to touch the content of these areas and therefore not risking to break anything…
My weblog has the menu on the right, but I cannot do that on the membership pages without a lot of hassle, and it’s not worth it.
Now I use EE for my own private toy site, so it’s not that much of an issue for me. But I know in my days that if I had told clients “our CMS is wonderful and has all these superb features, but when your clients log in their membership area to view their old orders they will see a grey/blue ugly boxy set of pages and that’s all there is to it” they would have told me how absurd that was. Now obviously this was our own CMS and it was at a much higher level than EE is (price tag too!) and it was only used by us to build sites for large clients so we didnt have to focus about anything besides functionality and usability and making sure our designers polished every last bit of it. Had we had to package it for release and use by any number of people we would have had to make a lot of limitations too.
But skinnable membership would be a good thing. After all this is where clients (customers of the client of your client) log in to view their orders/newsletter preferences etc.
As things stand I was considering trying to find an EE web agency to see whether they could do something to take over 3 large sites my current company has. But things like this membership issue certainly would not be acceptable to us.
It would open a lot of types of projects for EE if the membership was a little better integrated.